cd137 microbead kit Search Results


94
Miltenyi Biotec cd137 microbead kit
A, Schematic experiment setting. B, Increase in total number of cells of known (KIF-P1 and -P2, SYT-T1, -T2, -P1, -P2) and newly identified (KIF-sc1 and -sc2) TCRs upon antigen-specific stimulation and <t>CD137-enrichment</t> with dominance of KIF-P1 and -P2 harboring high precursor frequency. The two newly identified KIF2C-TCRs were selected based on fold change of TCR frequency and highest absolute frequency in the stimulated sample. C, Assessment of antigen-specific IFN-γ-secretion for the two newly identified TCRs KIF-sc1 and -sc2 in comparison to the known TCR KIF-P2. Cytokine secretion was measured by IFN-γ-ELISA upon 24h of co-culture of TCR-tg T cells from one representative donor with Mel15-LCLs transgenic for the mutated KIF2C P13L minigene (mut mg) and the wildtype KIF2C minigene (wt mg) as well as pulsed for 2h at 37°C with the mutated and wildtype peptide (mut pep and wt pep). An irrelevant peptide (irr peptide), target cells (LCL only) or T cells alone (T cell only) served as negative controls. D, Frequency of KIF-sc1 and -sc2 in relation to the previously identified TCR-sequences identified by deep sequencing of the TCR-β-chain in intestinal (MInt) and lung metastases (MLung) as well as corresponding non-malignant draining lymph nodes (MInt-LN1, MInt-LN2 and MLung-LN) of patient Mel15. Non-td: non-transduced.
Cd137 Microbead Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd137+microbead+kit/CD137+MicroBead+Kit%2C+human/bio_rxiv__2022__09__23__508529-196-16-19
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd137 microbead kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A, Schematic experiment setting. B, Increase in total number of cells of known (KIF-P1 and -P2, SYT-T1, -T2, -P1, -P2) and newly identified (KIF-sc1 and -sc2) TCRs upon antigen-specific stimulation and CD137-enrichment with dominance of KIF-P1 and -P2 harboring high precursor frequency. The two newly identified KIF2C-TCRs were selected based on fold change of TCR frequency and highest absolute frequency in the stimulated sample. C, Assessment of antigen-specific IFN-γ-secretion for the two newly identified TCRs KIF-sc1 and -sc2 in comparison to the known TCR KIF-P2. Cytokine secretion was measured by IFN-γ-ELISA upon 24h of co-culture of TCR-tg T cells from one representative donor with Mel15-LCLs transgenic for the mutated KIF2C P13L minigene (mut mg) and the wildtype KIF2C minigene (wt mg) as well as pulsed for 2h at 37°C with the mutated and wildtype peptide (mut pep and wt pep). An irrelevant peptide (irr peptide), target cells (LCL only) or T cells alone (T cell only) served as negative controls. D, Frequency of KIF-sc1 and -sc2 in relation to the previously identified TCR-sequences identified by deep sequencing of the TCR-β-chain in intestinal (MInt) and lung metastases (MLung) as well as corresponding non-malignant draining lymph nodes (MInt-LN1, MInt-LN2 and MLung-LN) of patient Mel15. Non-td: non-transduced.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: High-resolution profiling of neoantigen-specific T cell receptor activation signatures links moderate stimulation patterns to resilience and sustained tumor control

doi: 10.1101/2022.09.23.508529

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, Schematic experiment setting. B, Increase in total number of cells of known (KIF-P1 and -P2, SYT-T1, -T2, -P1, -P2) and newly identified (KIF-sc1 and -sc2) TCRs upon antigen-specific stimulation and CD137-enrichment with dominance of KIF-P1 and -P2 harboring high precursor frequency. The two newly identified KIF2C-TCRs were selected based on fold change of TCR frequency and highest absolute frequency in the stimulated sample. C, Assessment of antigen-specific IFN-γ-secretion for the two newly identified TCRs KIF-sc1 and -sc2 in comparison to the known TCR KIF-P2. Cytokine secretion was measured by IFN-γ-ELISA upon 24h of co-culture of TCR-tg T cells from one representative donor with Mel15-LCLs transgenic for the mutated KIF2C P13L minigene (mut mg) and the wildtype KIF2C minigene (wt mg) as well as pulsed for 2h at 37°C with the mutated and wildtype peptide (mut pep and wt pep). An irrelevant peptide (irr peptide), target cells (LCL only) or T cells alone (T cell only) served as negative controls. D, Frequency of KIF-sc1 and -sc2 in relation to the previously identified TCR-sequences identified by deep sequencing of the TCR-β-chain in intestinal (MInt) and lung metastases (MLung) as well as corresponding non-malignant draining lymph nodes (MInt-LN1, MInt-LN2 and MLung-LN) of patient Mel15. Non-td: non-transduced.

Article Snippet: Another 24h later, reactive T cells were separated using magnetic labelling and positive selection with the CD137 MicroBead Kit (Miltenyi).

Techniques: Comparison, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Transgenic Assay, Sequencing

A-C, Mel15 LCLs were pulsed with titrated peptide concentrations (2h, 37°C) and co- incubated with TCR-tg T cells with subsequent ELISA-based assessment of IFN-γ-secretion within 24h of co-culture (A). The cellular activation level was determined after 24h by FACS staining of the extracellular level of CD137 (B) and PD-1 (C) expression (reflected by geometric mean of all CD3 + CD8 + /TCRmu + cells). The mean for ELISA data is depicted for technical triplicates of one donor; triplicates from the same donor have been pooled prior to EC FACS- staining. E:T = 1:1 (15.000 tg T cells:15.000 tumor cells). D-G, EC FACS staining at different timepoints after co-culture setup displays temporal dynamics of T cell activation marker CD137 (D, E) and inhibitory receptor LAG-3 (F, G) for TCR-tg T cells upon co-culture with JJN3-B27 peptide-pulsed target cells. A weak (0.01 µM for peptide pulsing; D, F) versus a strong (1 µM for peptide pulsing; E, G) stimulus were compared. E:T = 1:1 (10.000 tg T cells:10.000 tumor cells). H, Annexin-V/PI-staining was employed for detection of activation induced cell death (AICD) after 20h of co-culture upon strong stimulation with 1µM mut-peptide pulsed Mel15 LCLs (early apoptotic = AnnexinV + PI - , late apoptotic = AnnexinV + PI + ). E:T = 1:1 (30.000 tg T cells:30.000 tumor cells). I, Representative FACS plot of a healthy donor of CTV-analysis for all TCRmu + cells depicted after 4 days of co-culture with 1µM mut-peptide pulsed Mel15 LCLs (colors were chosen according to Figure B-E; representative wt mg-control depicted in grey). E:T = 1:1 (30.000 tg T cells:30.000 tumor cells). For all co-cultures in D-I technical triplicates per donor were pooled prior to staining; the mean and SD for biological replicates from three different human donors are shown.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: High-resolution profiling of neoantigen-specific T cell receptor activation signatures links moderate stimulation patterns to resilience and sustained tumor control

doi: 10.1101/2022.09.23.508529

Figure Lengend Snippet: A-C, Mel15 LCLs were pulsed with titrated peptide concentrations (2h, 37°C) and co- incubated with TCR-tg T cells with subsequent ELISA-based assessment of IFN-γ-secretion within 24h of co-culture (A). The cellular activation level was determined after 24h by FACS staining of the extracellular level of CD137 (B) and PD-1 (C) expression (reflected by geometric mean of all CD3 + CD8 + /TCRmu + cells). The mean for ELISA data is depicted for technical triplicates of one donor; triplicates from the same donor have been pooled prior to EC FACS- staining. E:T = 1:1 (15.000 tg T cells:15.000 tumor cells). D-G, EC FACS staining at different timepoints after co-culture setup displays temporal dynamics of T cell activation marker CD137 (D, E) and inhibitory receptor LAG-3 (F, G) for TCR-tg T cells upon co-culture with JJN3-B27 peptide-pulsed target cells. A weak (0.01 µM for peptide pulsing; D, F) versus a strong (1 µM for peptide pulsing; E, G) stimulus were compared. E:T = 1:1 (10.000 tg T cells:10.000 tumor cells). H, Annexin-V/PI-staining was employed for detection of activation induced cell death (AICD) after 20h of co-culture upon strong stimulation with 1µM mut-peptide pulsed Mel15 LCLs (early apoptotic = AnnexinV + PI - , late apoptotic = AnnexinV + PI + ). E:T = 1:1 (30.000 tg T cells:30.000 tumor cells). I, Representative FACS plot of a healthy donor of CTV-analysis for all TCRmu + cells depicted after 4 days of co-culture with 1µM mut-peptide pulsed Mel15 LCLs (colors were chosen according to Figure B-E; representative wt mg-control depicted in grey). E:T = 1:1 (30.000 tg T cells:30.000 tumor cells). For all co-cultures in D-I technical triplicates per donor were pooled prior to staining; the mean and SD for biological replicates from three different human donors are shown.

Article Snippet: Another 24h later, reactive T cells were separated using magnetic labelling and positive selection with the CD137 MicroBead Kit (Miltenyi).

Techniques: Incubation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Activation Assay, Staining, Expressing, Marker, Control

A, Schematic experiment setting of xenograft neoTCR-tumor rejection experiment with newly transduced T cells. B, Tumor growth kinetics are displayed as tumor area (in cm 2 ) for mut mg-U698M-tumor- bearing NSG-mice comparing neoTCR-tg T cells to the irrelevant TCR 2.5D6 until day 20. Mean values and SDs for each group of mice display rejection dynamics (n=6). Parts of this dataset were already published before . In this renewed version, tumor rejection kinetics of KIF-sc1 and -sc2 analyzed in the same experiment are included. C, Kaplan-Meier-survival curve is displayed until day 20 for tumor-bearing mice injected with different neoTCR-tg T cells. D, schematic experiment setting of xenograft neoTCR-TIL-rechallenge experiment. E-G, Ex vivo restimulation of T cells derived from TIL products on day 21 after tumor explant (TIL-P) compared to newly transduced (NEW) TCR-tg T cells from the same human donor stained for CD137 (EC; E), IFN-γ (IC; F) and GzmB (IC; G); expression was analyzed using geometric mean of all CD3 + CD8 + /TCRmu + cells after 18h of co-culture. Mut-mg and wt-mg U698M cells were used as target cells in E:T = 1:1 (50.000 tg T cells:50.000 tumor cells). Mean and SD are shown for three experimental replicates. Statistical significance is calculated with one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test (*p≤0.05, ****p≤0.0001). H, Tumor growth kinetics are displayed as tumor area (in cm 2 ) for NSG-mice continuing the experiment until day 17 after second injection of in total 5x10 6 neoTCR-tg T cells (transduction rate of 55% equalized for all groups). For the TIL- P-groups, TIL-P from two mice per TCR (highest numbers of expanded neoTCR-tg T cells) were pooled. Mean values and SEMs for each group of mice display rejection dynamics (n=5 for experimental groups, n=3 for 2.5D6; due to achievement of humane endpoint criteria one 2.5D6- control mouse was sacrificed on day 13 and excluded from this graph). Statistical significance is calculated for the tumor area on day 17 with one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test (***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001). I , Kaplan-Meier-survival curve is displayed for tumor-bearing mice injected with different TCR-tg T cells (n=5 for experimental groups, n=4 for 2.5D6 control). Survival of mice receiving TIL-P-KIF-P2 compared to TIL-P-KIF-sc1 was significantly prolonged (p=0.0019, Mantel-Cox test).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: High-resolution profiling of neoantigen-specific T cell receptor activation signatures links moderate stimulation patterns to resilience and sustained tumor control

doi: 10.1101/2022.09.23.508529

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, Schematic experiment setting of xenograft neoTCR-tumor rejection experiment with newly transduced T cells. B, Tumor growth kinetics are displayed as tumor area (in cm 2 ) for mut mg-U698M-tumor- bearing NSG-mice comparing neoTCR-tg T cells to the irrelevant TCR 2.5D6 until day 20. Mean values and SDs for each group of mice display rejection dynamics (n=6). Parts of this dataset were already published before . In this renewed version, tumor rejection kinetics of KIF-sc1 and -sc2 analyzed in the same experiment are included. C, Kaplan-Meier-survival curve is displayed until day 20 for tumor-bearing mice injected with different neoTCR-tg T cells. D, schematic experiment setting of xenograft neoTCR-TIL-rechallenge experiment. E-G, Ex vivo restimulation of T cells derived from TIL products on day 21 after tumor explant (TIL-P) compared to newly transduced (NEW) TCR-tg T cells from the same human donor stained for CD137 (EC; E), IFN-γ (IC; F) and GzmB (IC; G); expression was analyzed using geometric mean of all CD3 + CD8 + /TCRmu + cells after 18h of co-culture. Mut-mg and wt-mg U698M cells were used as target cells in E:T = 1:1 (50.000 tg T cells:50.000 tumor cells). Mean and SD are shown for three experimental replicates. Statistical significance is calculated with one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test (*p≤0.05, ****p≤0.0001). H, Tumor growth kinetics are displayed as tumor area (in cm 2 ) for NSG-mice continuing the experiment until day 17 after second injection of in total 5x10 6 neoTCR-tg T cells (transduction rate of 55% equalized for all groups). For the TIL- P-groups, TIL-P from two mice per TCR (highest numbers of expanded neoTCR-tg T cells) were pooled. Mean values and SEMs for each group of mice display rejection dynamics (n=5 for experimental groups, n=3 for 2.5D6; due to achievement of humane endpoint criteria one 2.5D6- control mouse was sacrificed on day 13 and excluded from this graph). Statistical significance is calculated for the tumor area on day 17 with one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test (***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001). I , Kaplan-Meier-survival curve is displayed for tumor-bearing mice injected with different TCR-tg T cells (n=5 for experimental groups, n=4 for 2.5D6 control). Survival of mice receiving TIL-P-KIF-P2 compared to TIL-P-KIF-sc1 was significantly prolonged (p=0.0019, Mantel-Cox test).

Article Snippet: Another 24h later, reactive T cells were separated using magnetic labelling and positive selection with the CD137 MicroBead Kit (Miltenyi).

Techniques: Injection, Ex Vivo, Derivative Assay, Staining, Expressing, Co-Culture Assay, Comparison, Transduction, Control